Effect of different mowing intensities on phytomass production of permanent grassland in a warm and an arid region


  • Ľuboš Vozár Slovak Agriculture University in Nitra
  • Miriama Lukács
  • Peter Kovár
  • Peter Hric


grassland, dry matter production, different intensity of mowing, production efficiency of fertiliser


The aim of the work was to analyse the impact of different intensities of grassland exploitation on the productive capacity in the context of declining livestock numbers and the need for temporary or permanent extensification. The research was carried out in 2017-2020 in the locality of Žirany in the Nitra district, located in the temperate zone at the boundary between the continental and Atlantic-continental regions. Average annual temperatures are around 9 °C. The original semi-natural vegetation has been used for sheep grazing for many years. There were 8 experimental variants of use/cutting with different intensity of exploitation: var. 1 - abandoned unused, var. 2 - 3x per year, var. 3 - 2x per year, var. 4 - 1x per year, var. 5 - 4x - 3x - 2x - 2x - 1x per year, var. 6 - 1x - 2x - 3x - 4x per year, var. 7 - 3x - 1x - 1x - 3x and var. 8 - 2x - 1x - 1x - 1x - 2x. By comparing the sum of yields for the entire 4-year annual cycle, we concluded that, with the exception of the 1x annually mowed variant, all the others differentiated themselves from the abandoned stand by their increased production capacity. We also observed differentiation between fertilized and exploited variants into groups. The stand mowed 3 times annually (variant 2, 29.07 t ha-1) was shown to be the most productive. The second group consisted of variants with production lower in the sum of 4 years by about 5 t ha-1 (3, 5, and 6). The same level of lower yield was then found on stands with temporarily reduced intensity of use (variants 7 and 8). In the effectiveness of applied nutrients on production growth, it was found that as the number of applications increased, nutrient use also increased. The average of the years in the overall assessment of the 4-year cycle showed the dynamics from the individual years and also confirmed the tendency of the highest nutrient use at a stable 3-cut use.


Borer, ET. et al. (2017). A decade of insight into grassland ecosystem responses to global environmental change. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2017: 1(15):0118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0118

Cameron, K.C. (2013). Nitrogen losses from soil/plant system: a review. Annals of applied biology, 2013, 162.2:145 – 173. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12014

Di, H., J. & Cameron, K.C. (2002). Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nitrient cycling in agroecosystem, 2002, 64.3: 237 – 256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021471531188

Dixon, A. (2014). Distribution mapping of world grassland types. Journal of Biogeography, 2014, 41 (11): 2003 – 19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12381

Dugátová, Z. et al. (2015). Grassland quality in dairy farming. In. Volume 9, issue 1/2015. ISSN 1337 – 589X. (in Slovak)

Economics and social development program 2014 – 2020 Village Žirany [online] retrived 2019-01-09 from http://www.zirany.eu/documents/1427100129phsr-zirany-2014.pdf (In Slovak)

FRAME, J. (1992). Improved grassland management. Farming Press Book, United Kingdom, Ipswich, 1992, 351 p.

Gáborčík, N. & Čunderlík, J. (1996). Primary production of three types of grassland under conditions of reduced nutrient inputs. In Faculty of Agronomy and the development of agriculture in Slovakia. Section A: Sustainable crop production systems and production quality. Nitra: VŠP, 1996, s. 273 – 277. (in Slovak)

Gibson, D. J. (2009). Grasses and grassland ecology. Oxford University Press : Oxford and New York 2009, 305 p. ISBN 978-0-19-85919-4.

Gibson, D. J., Newman J. A. (2019). eds. In GIBSON, David J., NEWMAN, Jonathan A. eds. Grasslands and Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Ecological Reviews, s. i-i. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108163941.003

Gliessman, S. (2015). Agroecology: the ecology of sustainable food system. Third edition, CRC Press NW, 371s. ISBN 978-1-4398-9561-0

Graux, A. I. et al. (2020). High – resolution assessment of French grassland dry matter and nitrogen yields. European Journal of Agronomy, 2020. 112:125952 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.125952

Grzegorczyk, S. & Grabowski, K. (2007). Productivity of grasslands in the Province of Warmia and Mazury. Permanent and temporary grassland, Plant, Environment and Economy, Proceedings of the 14th Symposium of the EGF. Ghent, Belgium, 2007, Grassland Science in Europe 12, p. 63 – 65. ISBN 9789081100731.

Hanzes, Ľ. et al. (2004). Effect of mineral fertilization on aboveground biomass production and the root system of perennial grassland. Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, issue. 7, 2004, č. 9, s. 78 – 83.

Hanzes, Ľ. et al. (2018). Floristic changes of grassland in the process of its regeneration. Ecological studies, 2018: 60 – 67.

Hopkins, A. et al. (1990). Response of permanent and reseeded grassland to fertilizer nitrogen. 1. Herbage production and herbage quality. Grass and Forage Science 45 (1), 1990, p. 43 – 55.

Hopkins, A. & Pinto, M. (1998). Low – input systems. Ecological aspects of grassland management. 17th EGF Meeting, 1998, p. 197 – 212.

Hopkins, A. et al. (2000). Grass: Its production and utilization. 3rd edition Blackwell Science 2000, pp. 104-195. ISBN 0-632-05017-9.

Jančovič J. (2004). Effect of fertilisation renovation on the production capacity of permanent grassland. Plant Soil Environ., 50: 129-133. https://doi.org/10.17221/4018-PSE

Jančovič, J. & Holúbek, R. (1993). Application of graded and alternating nitrogen rates to semi-natural grassland: final report. Nitra : VŠP, 50 p. (in Slovak)

Jones, M. B. (2019). Projected climate change and the global distribution of grassland. In: Gibson . Newman. 2019. Grasslands and climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Ecological Reviews, s. i-i. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108163941.003

Kováčiková, Z. et al. (2012). Effects of non-fertilised grassland management intensity on herbage quality and quantity. Agriculture, vol. 58, 2012, no. 2, p. 41-49. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10207-012-0005-8

Orford KA. et al. (2016). Modest enhancements to conventional grassland diversity improve the provision of pollination services. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2016;53(3):906-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12608

Paustian, K. et al. 2016. Climate-smart soils. Nature, 2016, 532.7597: 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17174

Pearson, C. J. & Ison, R.L. (1987). Agronomy of grassland systems. Cambridge University Press, 1987, 169 p. ISBN 0-521-31009-1.

Repa, Š. et al. (2001). Hay production in permanent grassland as a function of the sum of air temperatures. Bioclimatic working days 2001. International scientific conference. http://cbks.cz/sbornikRackova01/1.html#top (in Slovak)

Schnyder, H. et al. (2010). In Grassland in a changing world, Proceedings of the 23th Symposium of the EGF. Kiel, Germany, 2010 Grassland Science in Europe 15, p. V. ISBN 978-3-86944-021-7.

Smith, R.S. & Jones, L. (1991). The phenology of mesotrophic grassland in the Pennine Dales, Northern England: historic hay cutting dates, vegetation variation and plant species phenologies. Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, p. 42 – 59.

Soussana, J. F. et al. (2010). Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands. Animal, 2010, 4.3: 334-350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109990784

StatSoft, Inc. (2011). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. http://www.statsoft.com

Vozár, Ľ. et al. (2003). Grassland production capacity after fertilisation restoration. Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, č. 4. Nitra: SUA, p p. 101 – 105. (in Slovak)






Plant Science