Energy content of hybrid Rumex patienta L. x Rumex tianschanicus A. Los. (Rumex OK 2) samples from autumn months

Michal Rolinec, Dzhamal Rakhmetov, Daniel Bíro, Miroslav Juráček, Milan Šimko, Branislav Gálik, Ondrej Hanušovský


Received: 2018-01-30 | Accepted: 2018-02-26 | Available online: 2018-03-31

Aim of this experiment was to determine the gross energy concentration of fresh, wilted and ensiled hybrid of Rumex patientia L. x Rumex tianschanicus A. Los. (Rumex OK 2). Samples were collected in autumn months of the year 2017. The plant of Rumex OK 2 consist during autumn months only from rosette of leaves. The height of leaves was in autumn months following, September 56.68±13.80 cm; October 59.29±11.93 cm and November 55.98±10.80 cm. Rumex OK 2 silage was made from wilted matter, with or without of addition of dried molasses. Gross energy was determined as the heat released after combustion of a sample (Leco AC 500) in MJ per kilogram of dry matter of the sample. By the autumn months the concentration of dry matter, as well as the concentration of gross energy increased, except Rumex OK 2 silage from November. The highest concentration of gross energy had wilted Rumex OK 2 from November (18.02 of dry matter). There was no significant effect of addition of dried molasses to wilted Rumex OK 2 before ensiling on gross energy concentration in Rumex OK 2 silages (P>0.05). Gross energy concentration of all types of analysed samples had relative high value (16.98 to 18.02 of dry matter). Fresh or ensiled Rumex OK 2 can be used as a part of feed ratio for ruminants or can be utilised in biogas station. However, due to the low content of dry mater in fresh or wilted material the production of silage can be in autumn months problematic.

Keywords: Rumex OK 2, silage, gross energy, dry matter


BAZHAY-ZHEZHERUN, S. and RAKHMETOV, D. (2014) Nutritional value of shchavnat. In Food Industry, no. 16, pp. 15-19. Available from: (in Ukrainian).

BÍRO, D. et al. (2007) Nutritive value and digestibility characteristics of different maize silage hybrids. In Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17-19.

DERRICK, R.W. et al. (1993) Intake, by sheep, and digestibility of chickweed, dandelion, dock, ribwort and spurrey, compared with perennial ryegrass. In The Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 51-61. Doi:

GÁLIK, B. et al. (2016) Nutritional characteristics of feeds. Nitra: Slovak University of agriculture in Nitra (in Slovak).

HEJDUK, S. and DOLEŽAL, P. (2004) Nutritive value of broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.) and its effect on the quality of grass silages. In Czech Journal of Animal Science, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 144-450. Available from:

HEJDUK, S. and DOLEŽAL, P. (2008) Effect of broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.) on grass silage quality. In Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae mendelianea brunensis, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 75-80. Doi:

HOLM, G.L. et al. (1977) The world’s worst weeds; distribution and biology. Hawaii: University Press of Hawaii Honolulu.

HRIC, P. et al. (2013) The influence of mycorrhizal preparations on the growth and production process of turf under non-irrigated conditions. In Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-4. Available from:

HUMPHREYS, J. et al. (1999) Soil potassium supply and Rumex obtusifolius and Rumex crispus abundance in silage and grazed grassland swards. In Weed Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1-13. Doi:

JURÁČEK, M. et al. (2010) Silage energy value for bioenergy utilization. In Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 76-78. Available from:

KOVÁČIKOVÁ, E. (1997) Food Tables – Fruit and Vegetables. Bratislava: Food Research Institute (in Slovak).

MAGA, J. et al. (2008) Complex model of biomass utilisation for energy purpose. Nitra: Slovak University of agriculture in Nitra (in Slovak).

MARTINKOVA, Z. et al. (2009) Weather and survival of broadleaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.) in an unmanaged grassland. In Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 214-2017. Available from:

PAJTÁŠ, M. et al. (2009) Nutrition and feeding of animals – terminologically educational dictionary. Nitra: Slovak University of agriculture in Nitra (in Slovak).

PEPICH, Š. (2006) Ekonomical incidence of biomass utilisation in energetics of agricultural enterprise. In Agrobioenergia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9-10 (in Slovak). Available from:

PETŘÍKOVÁ, V. (2009) Rumex OK 2 – fodder sorrel. [Online]. Retrieved 2018-01-25 from: (in Czech).

PETŘÍKOVÁ, V. (2011) Energy use of Rumex. [Online]. Retrieved 2018-01-25 from: (in Czech).

PETŘÍKOVÁ, V. (2012) Forage plant – Rumex OK 2. [Online]. Retrieved 2018-01-25 from: (in Czech).

PETRIKOVIČ, P. et al. (2000) Nutritional value of feeds, I. part. Nitra: Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra (in Slovak).

RAKHMETOV, D.B. and RAKHMETOVA, S.O. (2006) Varietal diversification of shchavnat (Rumex patientia L. × R. tianschаnicus Losinsk) and directions of its use. In Plant Introduction, no. 1, рр. 11-16. Available from: (in Ukrainian).

RAKHMETOV, D.B. and RAKHMETOVA, S.O. (2011) Shchavnat: both fruit, and feed and biofuels. In Cereal, no. 3, pp. 8-10. Available from: (in Russian).

SKLÁDANKA, J. et al. (2014) Forage production. Brno: Mendel University in Brno (in Czech).

USŤAK, S. (2007) Cultivation and use of fodder sorrel in condition of Czech Republic. Prague: Crop Research Institute. Available from: (in Czech).

WALLSTEN, J. (2003) In vivo and in vitro digestibility of lichens and silage for reindeer. Uppsala: Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics. Available from:

Full Text:



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica

© Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources