The effect of biological additive on nutrient composition of grass silage
Abstract
DOI: 10.15414/afz.2015.18.04.106–109
Received 7. July 2015 ǀ Accepted 28. August 2015 ǀ Available online 7. December 2015
The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of biological additive on nutrient composition of grass silages. The experiment
was realized in practical conditions on the farm RD Klenovec in 2013. Grass mass of permanent grassland was ensiled in
silage bags. Laboratory analysis of silage samples were carried out at 8 weeks of fermentation, 6 and 12 months of storage.
Into grass silage of experimental group was added biological additive, consisted of mixture of homofermentative and
heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria. Inoculant included strains Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus plantarum. There
were not found significant differences (P >0.05) between the control and experimental group in contents of nutrients in
individual analysis of silage samples. We found higher values of dry matter, crude protein and organic matter, and lower
content of ash after supplementation of biological additive in all analyzed samples. Tendency of (P >0.05) a higher content
of crude fiber was found after 8 weeks, 6 months of storage and fat after 12 months of storage. There were found significant
(P <0.05) differences in contents of NEL after 8 weeks and 12 months of storage and NEG only after 12 months of storage
between control and experimental samples of silage.
Keywords: grass silage, fermentation, inoculant, nutrients
References
ASTON, K., SUTTON, J.D. and FISHER, W.J. (1995). Milk production from grass silage diets: strategies for concentrate allocation. In Anim. Sci., vol. 61, pp. 465-480. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S135772980001403X
ÁVILA, C.L.S. et al. (2009) Effect of an indigenous and a commercial Lactobacillus buchneri strain on quality of sugar cane silage. In Grass Forage Sci., vol. 64, pp. 384-394. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2009.00703.x
BURKE, F. et al. (2007). Comparative evaluation of alternative forages to grass silage in the diet of early lactation dairy cows. In J. Dairy Sci., vol. 90, pp. 908-917. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71574-6
BUXTON, D.R., MUCK, R.E., and HARRISON, J.H. (2003) Silage Science and Technology. Washington: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 305-360.
DOLEŽAL, P. and HEJDUK, S. (2002) The effect of inoculation of wilted extensive grassland for silage fermentation process. In Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic Mendel. Brun., vol. L 9, no. 5, pp. 67-74 (in Czech).
DOLEŽAL, P. et al. (2012) Preservation of feeds and their use in animal nutrition. Brno: Mendel University in Brno.
DRIEHUIS, F. et al. (1999) Anaerobic lactic acid degradation during ensilage of whole crop maize inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri inhibits yeast growth and improves aerobic stability. In J. Appl. Microbiol., vol. 87, pp. 583-594. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00856.x
GUO, X.S., UNDERSANDER, D.J. and COMBS, D.K. (2013) Effect of Lactobacillus inoculants and forage dry matter on the fermentation and aerobic stability of ensiled mixed-crop tall fescue and meadow fescue. In J. Dairy Sci., vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 1735-1744. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2045-5786
JALČ, D. et al. (2009) The use of bacterial inoculants for grass silage: their effects on nutrient composition and fermentation parameters in grass silages. In Czech J. Anim. Sci., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 84-91.
JANČOVÁ, M. (2009) Influence of microbial and microbial-enzymatic preparations on the digestibility and nutritional value of grass silage. Ph.D. Thesis. Nitra: SUA (in Slovak).
JANČOVÁ, M. (2014) Conserved forage and their quality: research report. Banská Bystrica: VUTP (in Slovak).
JASTER, E.H. (1994) Complex interactions from inoculants, enzymes explored. In Feedstuffs, vol. 66, no. 52, pp. 13-27.
LÁD, F. et al. (2006) The influence of silage additives for qualitative parameters of clover-grass silages. In J. Cent. Eur. Agr., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 313-318.
MERRY, R.J., JONES, R. and THEODOROU, M.K. (2000) The conservation of grass. In Hopkins A. (ed.). Grass – its Production and Utilization. 3rd ed., Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
PAHLOW, G. et al. (2003) Microbiology of ensiling. In: BUXTON, D.R., MUCK, R.E. and HARRISON, J.H. (eds) Silage science and technology. Madison: ASA, CSSA, SSSA, pp. 31-94.
SAARISALO, E. et al. (2007) Screening and selection of lactic acid bacteria strains suitable for ensiling grass. In J. Appl. Microbiol., vol. 102, pp. 327-336. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03103.x
STEINSHAMN, H. and THUEN, E. (2008) White or red clover-grass silage in organic dairy milk production: Grassland productivity and milk production responses with different levels of concentrate. In Livest. Sci., vol. 119, no. 1-3, pp. 202-215. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.04.004 WINTERS, A.L., FYCHAN, R. and JONES, R. (2001) Effect of formic acid and a bacterial inoculants on the amino acid composition of grass silage and on animal performance. In Grass Forage Sci, vol. 56, no. 2, pp.181-192. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2001.00265.x
ŽÚREK, H. and WRÓBEL, B. (2006) The evaluation of quality and nutritive value of sedge herbage ensilaged in big bales. In 12th International Symposium Forage Conservation, April 3-4, 2006, Brno. Brno: Mendel University, pp.149-151.
Full Text:
PDFRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica
© Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources