Soil structure as a significant indirect factor affecting crop yields

Vladimír Šimanský, Martin Juriga, Marcel Golian, Miroslav Šlosár, Marek Provazník

Abstract


Article Details: Received: 2021-01-29 | Accepted: 2021-02-22 | Available online: 2021-06-30 https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2021.24.02.129-136

 

The use of organic amendments for improving soil properties including soil structure is crucial for sustainable soil management. In this study, two organic materials (1. compost, and 2. farmyard manure) both at a rate of 44 t ha-1 as well as their combination were applied to a Hortic Calcaric Fluvisol (Slovakia) to evaluate the soil physical properties to test the potential of these amendments for soil amelioration under gardening conditions. The results showed that the addition of organic amendments did not have any significant effects on bulk density, total porosity, soil moisture and aeration, but their application influenced the total contents of dry-sieved aggregates as well as water-stable aggregates. The highest content of dry-sieved macro-aggregates was in compost > farmyard manure + compost > farmyard manure > control (unfertilized). The stability of aggregates was higher in compost and farmyard manure + compost treatments than in farmyard manure compared to control. Also, better soil structure stability evaluated by vulnerability coefficient was in farmyard manure + compost and compost than in farmyard manure. The highest contents of soil organic carbon and humic substances were found in the farmyard manure + compost treatment and then compost > farmyard manure > control. In compost, farmyard manure and farmyard manure + compost treatments, cabbage yield increased by 52, 22 and 72%, respectively compared to control treatment. Cabbage yields linear also increased as a result of increasing of soil organic carbon and humic substances.

Keywords: aggregate stability, coefficient vulnerability, cabbage yield, compost, farmyard manure, soil organic matter

References

Are, K. S. et al. (2017). Improving physical properties of degraded soil: Potential of poultry manure and biochar. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 51, 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2018.03.009

Belmonte, S. A. et al. (2018). Effect of Long-Term Soil Management on the Mutual Interaction Among Soil Organic Matter, Microbial Activity and Aggregate Stability in a Vineyard. Pedosphere, 28(2), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(18)60015-3

Bronick, C. J. & Lal, R. (2005). Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma, 124, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005

Colombi, T. et al. (2017). Artificial macropores attract crop roots and enhance plant productivity on compacted soils. Science Total Environment, 574, 1283–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.194

Dörner, J. et al. (2010). The role of soil structure on the pore functionality of an Ultisol. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 10, 495–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162010000200009

Fulajtár, E. (2006). Physical Properties of Soil. VÚPOP, Bratislava. In Slovak.

Gosling, P. et al. (2013). What are the primary factors controlling the light fraction and particulate soil organic matter content of agricultural soils? Biology and Fertility of Soils, 49, 1001–1014.

Harris, R. F. G. et al. (1966). Dynamics of soil aggregation. Advantages in Agronomy, 18, 107–169.

Hrivňáková, K. et al. (2011). The uniform methods of soil analysis. VÚPOP, Bratislava. In Slovak.

Idowu, O. J. (2003). Relationships between aggregate stability and selected soil properties in humid tropical environment. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 34(5–6), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120018969

Iwai, Ch. B. et al. (2019). Vermicompost as soil amendment for sustainable land and environment in Thailand. In Rakshit, A. et al. (eds.) Soil amendments for sustainability, challenges and perspectives. CRP Press, Taylor & Francis Group (pp. 321–348).

Kay, B. D. et al. (2006). Optimum versus non-limiting water contents for root growth, biomass accumulation, gas Exchange and the rate of development of maize (Zea mays L.). Soil & Tillage Research, 88, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.04.005

Lal, R. & Shukla, M. K. (2004). Principles of soil physics. Marcel Dekker, New York. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.0756c.x

Łoginow, W. et al. (1987). Fractionation of organic carbon based on susceptibility to oxidation. Polish Journal of Soil Science, 20, 47–52.

McKenzie, B. M. et al. (2011). Soil physical quality. In Gliński, J. et al. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Agrophysics. Springer Science, Coppenhagen (pp. 770–777).

Nayak, S. & Mishra, C. S. K. (2019). Nutrient enrichment of mine spoil with suitable organic and bio-fertilizer amendments as a sustainable technology for eco-restoration. In Rakshit, A. et al. (eds.) Soil amendments for sustainability, challenges and perspectives. CRP Press, Taylor & Francis Group (pp. 349–361).

Oliveira, D. et al. (2015). Physical soil quality under different management systems and swine slurry application. Agriambi, 19, 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n3p280-285

Onweremadu, E. U. et al. (2007). Carbon and nitrogen distribution in water-stable aggregates under two tillage techniques in Fluvisols of Owerriarea, southeastern Nigeria. Soil & Tillage Research, 97, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2007.09.011

Polláková, N. & Šimanský, V. (2015). Physical properties of Urban soil in the campus of Slovak University of Agriculture Nitra. Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, 18(2), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2015.18.02.30-35

Polláková, N. & Šimanský, V. (2015a) Selected soil chemical properties in the campus of Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra. Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, 18(3), 66–70. https://doi.org/0.15414/afz.2015.18.03.66-70

Riffaldi, R. et al. (1998). Adsorption on soil of dissolved organic carbon from farmyard manure. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment, 69, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00097-8

Shen, H. et al. (2001). Effect of fertilization on oxidizible carbon, microbial biomass carbon and mineralizable carbon under different agroecosystems. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 32(2), 1575–1588. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-100104214

Šimanský, V. et al. (2013). The effect of organic matter on aggregation under different soil management practices in a vineyard in an extremely humid year. Catena, 101, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2012.10.011

Šimanský, V. & Bajčan, D. (2014). The stability of soil aggregates and their ability of carbon sequestration. Soil & Water Research, 9(3), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.17221/106/2013-SWR

Šimanský, V. et al. (2018). Response of soil organic matter and water-stable aggregates to different biochar treatments including nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 66(4), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2018-0033

Šimanský, V. et al. (2017). Guide for soil science. Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra. In Slovak.

Špánik, F. et al. (2002). Agroclimatic and phenological characteristics of the town of Nitra (1999–2000). Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra. In Slovak.

Váchalová, R. et al. (2016). Primary soil organic matter and humus, two components of soil organic matter. Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra. In Czech.

Valla, M. et al. (2000). Vulnerability of aggregates separated from selected Anthrosols developed on reclaimed dumpsites. Rostlinná výroba, 46, 563–568. https://doi.org/10.17221/4376-PSE

Vaněk, V. et al. (2013). Nutrition of field and garden crops. Profi Press, Nitra. In Czech and Slovak.

Zaujec, A. & Šimanský, V. (2006). Influence of biostimulators of plant residue decomposition on soil structure and soil organic matter. Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, In Slovak.


Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica

© Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources