Energy content of hybrid Rumex patientia L. x Rumex tianschanicus A.Los (Rumex OK 2) samples from spring months and June

Michal Rolinec, Dzhamal Rakhmetov, Daniel Bíro, Miroslav Juráček, Milan Šimko, Branislav Gálik, Ondrej Hanušovský

Abstract


Article Details: Received: 2018-05-26 | Accepted: 2018-06-26 | Available online: 2018-06-30

https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2018.21.02.60-62

Aim of this study was to determine the gross energy concentration of fresh, wilted and ensiled Rumex OK 2 (Rumex patientia L. x Rumex tianschanicus A.Los.) from spring months and June. Samples were collected in spring months and June of the year 2018. The plant of Rumex OK 2 consist in March mainly from rosette of leaves and the stalk is not higher than leaves, from April is stalk higher than rosette of leaves. The height of Rumex OK 2 during analysed months was following, March 60.96 ± 5.22 cm; April 114.70 ± 35.15 cm, May 168.31 ± 39.74 cm and June 197.41 ± 48.44 cm. Rumex OK 2 silage was made from wilted matter, with or without of addition of dried molasses. Gross energy was determined as the heat released after combustion of a sample (Leco AC 500) in MJ per kilogram of dry matter (DM) of the sample. The dry matter and gross energy concentration of fresh Rumex OK 2 increased during study, dry matter from 7.42% in March to 56.97% in June and gross energy from 18.00 MJ.kg-1 of DM in March to 18.88 MJ.kg-1 of DM in June. Statistically significant (P<0.05) higher concentration of dry matter, as well as gross energy was detected in wilted Rumex OK 2 samples and silages from May compared to April. Addition of dried molasses to wilted Rumex OK 2 did not affected concentration of gross energy in silages (P>0.05). From all analysed Rumex OK 2 samples the highest concentration of gross energy had silage from May with addition of dried molasses, 19.04 MJ.kg-1 of DM. The utilisation of Rumex OK 2 from spring months can by neither for bioenergy production as a source of renewable energy, or after evaluation of nutritive value as a source of energy and nutrients in animal nutrition in form of pasture and silage. Rumex OK 2 from summer months seems to be utilized only as a source of heat via direct combustion.

Keywords: Rumex OK 2, silage, gross energy, dry matter

References

BAZHAY-ZHEZHERUN, S. and RAKHMETOV, D. (2014) Nutritional value of shchavnat. Food Industry [Online]. no. 16, pp. 15-19. Retrieved 2018-06-13 from http://dspace.nuft.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/24166/1/2.pdf (in Ukrainian).

Bíro, D. et al. (2014) Conservation and adjustment of feeds. Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra (in Slovak).

GÁLIK, B. et al. (2016) Nutritional characteristics of feeds. Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra (in Slovak).

HEJDUK, S. and DOLEŽAL, P. (2004) Nutritive value of broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.) and its effect on the quality of grass silages. Czech Journal of Animal Science, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 144- 450.

HEJDUK, S. and DOLEŽAL, P. (2008) Effect of broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.) on grass silage quality. In Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae mendelianea brunensis, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 75-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun200856050075

HRIC, P. et al. (2013) The influence of mycorrhizal preparations on the growth and production process of turf under non-irrigated conditions. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica [Online], vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–4. Retrieved 2018-06-13 from http://www.acta.fapz.uniag.sk/journal/index.php/on_line/article/view/58

HRIC, P. et al. (2018) The changes of the assimilation pigments content of turf Festuca spp. leaves after application of different nutrition forms. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 6-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2018.21.01.06-10

PETŘÍKOVÁ, V. (2006) Biomass from energy plants. [Online]. Retrieved 2018-06-13 from https://biom.cz/cz/odborne-clanky/biomasa-z-energetickych-rostlin (in Czech).

ROLINEC, M. et al. (2018) Energy content of hybrid Rumex patientia L. x Rumex tianschanicus A.Los. (Rumex OK 2) samples from autumn months. In Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 20-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2018.21.01.20-23

SKLÁDANKA, J. et al. (2014) Forage production. Brno: Mendel University in Brno (in Czech).

USŤAK, S. (2007) Cultivation and use of fodder sorrel in condition of Czech Republic. Prague: Crop Research Institute (in Czech).


Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica

© Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources